Awaiting reviewer assignment meaning Because ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ means that the manuscript passed the admin and/or Associate Editor (AE) check and was awaiting peer review. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment means the journal editor has started reaching out to potential reviewers for your manuscript. Where do you find a reviewer’s R-Score? The R-Score can be found in the Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: تعدادی از داورها انجام داوری را پذیرفته اند اما هنوز به تعداد کافی نرسیده است Awaiting Reviewer Scores: تعداد کافی پذیرفتند مقاله شما را داوری کنند و ادیتورها منتظر نظرات آنها هستند You will see little messages like ‘awaiting editorial approval’, ‘awaiting reviewer scores’, ‘awaiting editorial board comments’ and ‘decision pending’ as your article wends its way through this process. When the status changes to "Under Review", the manuscript is with reviewers Note that the review process at BLC is single-anonymous. For instance, it’s not clear if the initial status was ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ or whether there was some other status prior to that. "Awaiting reviewer assignment" means that the AE has sent your manuscript to a certain number of reviewers, waiting for their agreement to review. This change has occurred After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Awaiting EIC decision must have appeared after the first status while you did not check your status! It Appearing after short interval of awaiting reviewer assignment clearly means that associate editors have advised against it! Now the EIC has to make decision. Then one day it was awaiting reviewer assignment, and then after a couple of days it went back to awaiting reviewer selection. ‘Awaiting Reviewer’ means that the manuscript has been sent to the peer reviewers. Can you please explain what it is going on? Awaiting Screener Assignment: This typically means that the editor has not been able to find the requisite number of reviewers and is still looking. 2, the assignment result of reviewers to papers determines the expertise of the reviewer who will review the paper, hence it is the crucial step in the whole peer review process. A month ago, I submitted my paper to the Emerald journal, which uses the ScholarOne manuscript system. I didnt see the "under review It means nothing. Then a few days later it switched back to "Awaiting referee assignment" again. I took this to mean that the paper has passed the desk review, since the editor is selecting reviewers. Papers that do not meet these criteria will be rejected. This status typically means your manuscript is awaiting assignment to an editor after the initial review of the submission. After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. A review invitation has been sent out but the reviewer has not yet accepted it. It often means we asked 6 people, 3 agreed, 2 said no, and 1 never responded to the request. This is usually because of a scope mismatch, or in some cases, the novelty and/or quality of Awaiting Reviewer Scores. " Also known as: with reviewers, with referees, under review, awaiting referee assignment, awaiting referee reports, awaiting reviewer scores, awaiting reviewer invitation , reviewers assigned, manuscript assigned to peer Meaning of the Under Review status in the ScholarOne system Coming to your present query, as we just indicated, this has been a slow change from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘Under Review. , "Awaiting AE decision". Once the required number of reviewers accept the review invitation, the Awaiting Reviewer Invitation. When the system shows the status “Reviewer invited,” it Answer: The status ‘Awaiting Referee Selection’ typically means that the manuscript is awaiting peer review. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. Then, there was a call for reviewers, and the status changed to ‘Reviewers Invited. " I think my manuscript entered a time loop. Then after a week or so, it changed to "Awaiting Reviewer Score(s)" and same day it changed back to "Under Review". ” Should I inquire about the review status? The Invite Reviewers Menu is found on the left side of the Reviewer Selection Summary Page and is divided into sections:. Hello, for your information, I submitted my paper on the 28. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment means the journal editor has started reaching out to potential reviewers for your manuscript. It is now about a month after resubmission and the status is “awaiting peer review and pending decision. the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment A specific threshold T can be defined to identify the qualifications of reviewers. What the Hell?! What does it mean if after 6 weeks the status "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again As can be inferred from Fig. – StrongBad. Meaning of change from Awaiting AE Recommendation back to Awaiting Reviewer Scores It could be that not all the reviewer’s final comments have come in. If it is not a desk reject, then it will surely go to The status of my submission is still "awaiting assignment". And now statues is "awaiting ed final processing". EDIT: Well now it jumped back to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. " This is where you can rate the review, and it will become part of the reviewer's score. There is no set time for this to take. The reviewer has accepted the invitation and the editor is waiting to receive reviewer comments. 40 days later, I received a decision letter suggesting minor revision, after which I made the suggested changes and submitted again. Note that an Edit link appears here only if you have permission to adjust the settings. ' Is it under review again or has the editor not seen my paper? Could you please clarify? Meaning of quick change from Awaiting Reviewer Selection to Awaiting Decision While this typically means that the manuscript is awaiting peer review, because the status changed so quickly after submission, this So, you could check the exact status. Perhaps one or more are pending. This paper really means a lot to me. Peer review The Editor decides whether reviews from additional experts are needed to evaluate the manuscript. It passed the initial evaluation 10 days later. I sent two emails about updating the status of the paper to editor and Editor-in-Chief several days ago and I got no reply from them. My manuscript submission status in ManuscriptCentral changed from ‘Awaiting Referee Assignment’ to ‘Under Review’ after 15 days of submission. Awaiting reviewer scores --> self-explanatory Reviews completed --> self-explanatory With editor --> this may occur early in the review process, indicating the article is under desk review by relevant editor(s), who are deciding whether to send the paper to reviewers; but it may also occur after reviewer scores are received, indicating the "Awaiting ED Decision" would suggest that a decision is pending on your manuscript, which may not be a rejection - but in fact could be a suggestion to revise and resubmit, or even an acceptance. Generally, the number of reviewers who agree to review is greater than or equal to 3 (in a few cases, 2 is also acceptable), and the status will change to "awaiting reviewer scores". Hi. Mental Health in Academia. ) – aparente001. While this is, Going by that assumption, the status of your first manuscript "ED: Not Assigned, GE: Not Assigned, Awaiting JM Checklist" means that no action has yet been taken on your paper. The entire peer review process usually takes between 2 and 6 months. 15. well I'm not sure. But only after two days under review the status changed to “ Maybe the reviews were quick or a reviewer declined the review. – Parnian. This rather ambiguous stage is when reviewers have I submitted a paper of mine to an Emerald journal. Due to the situation necessitated by COVID-19, journal workflows and decision-making may have been impacted to some extent. ' On May 21, our paper's status changed to 'Editorial assignment pending. If the status of the manuscript is shown as "With Editor", the manuscript is either awaiting in- house evaluation or is awaiting the assignment of reviewers. Awaiting Reviewer Selection, which is the next stage, means that the editor has received responses from multiple peer reviewers and is presently in It means the Editor wants to assign your manuscript to a reviewer. This change has occurred 'Awaiting decision' means the required reviews to make a decision were completed. After half a day, the status changed to ‘Under Review. Article awaiting reviewer invitation 6 months after submission. The assigned reviewer will review the manuscript and provide recommendations that would help the editor reach a If the editorial management system (EMS) is distinguishing between the two, odds are "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" means the reviewers have not been invited yet, and It means that the reviewers have not been assigned yet. A reviewer may recommend that the editor immediately accepts or rejects a submission, or they may request revisions. awaiting AE decision, then Awaiting Awaiting Referee Reports meaning. After 40 days of the status being Awaiting Reviewer Selection, it changed to Awaiting EIC Decision. So, one can’t really put a timeline to it. Due to those unanswered invites, the status says 'awaiting assignment. ' I have heard from seniors that the EiC is only consulted for making acceptance-related decisions and that the AE gives [makes] other Awaiting Reviewer Selection: This means that the AE has gone through the manuscript, and based on the factors mentioned above, decided to send it for peer review, and is therefore, now looking out for suitable Editor here. Thank you for your question. Commented Jun 26 After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Oct 2022, it passed all the steps of reviews. I received provisional acceptance with minor revisions. But after three days of this change, suddenly, the status changed back to ‘Awaiting Referee Assignment. The status of the paper was 'Submitted. Now the status is I submitted a manuscript 4. The current status of the manuscript is ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ and has not changed for a month now. This change has occurred One of the slightly confusing things that GEMS does to authors is show them the Manuscript Status Table at the bottom of the page regarding a submission. Once the journal sends reviewer invitations and the reviewers accept them, peer review will start and the status will change to "Under review. What does this mean? Will it go for review? The first process ( Awaiting Reviewer Invitation ) means looking for suitable reviewers to invitate While the second process ( Awaiting Reviewer Assignmet) means suitable reviewers has been found The manuscript being stuck at Awaiting Reviewer Assignment for a month is not uncommon. I submitted a manuscript to a Sage Journal almost 50 days ago. In fact, this also probably means that the reviewer invitations have not been sent out yet. Once initial check up is done on your manuscript, the EIC will screen your manuscript to check if it fits the scope of the journal and if it is of sufficient interest to the journal's readership. Assigned editor had perhaps sent the names and share your comment on signal processing, and that reviewers. As shown in this question on the process for journals , that initial Awaiting AE assignment to Under Review? Related. I submitted a paper to a journal. ’ It's been one month since this change happened and there is no update. This means that potential reviewers have been selected, but have yet to be invited. Initially, I got my first review as provisionally accepted with major revision within 2 months. If all the reviewers accept the invitations, the peer review process will The Awaiting CE/Reviewer Scores status also means that the AE has assigned the basic number of peer reviewers required for the manuscript, either two or three. This change has occurred The editors are reading it and checking their reviewer list. What does "awaiting reviewer scores" means after revision? Question. Required Reviews - #: when this number of reviews are complete, the status changes to 'Required Reviews Complete' Uninvite After - # . What does this mean? The status "Reviewers contacted" means that the editor has sent out review invitations to the requisite number of reviewers (usually 2 or 3). A copy of the reviewer list will be available. Invitation to Reviewers. This change has occurred AE stands for Associate Editor. Commented Nov 21, 2016 at 8:43. It it is desk reject, then reviewer means the editor herself. The paper was accepted with minor revision (two reviewers both recommended 'minor revision'). Commented Mar 8, 2017 at 12:19 @PsySp There is a section "Editorial decision" in the answer of the linked Awaiting allocation: The paper has been assigned to the Editor but has not yet been sent to reviewers (however, the Editor may have assigned the manuscript to an Associate Editor – there is no separate system status to indicate this). Relatedly, does under review mean that the AE has sent to referees or just that AE has been assigned? As I recall, it switches to showing Awaiting reviewer scores, the. A plausible guess is that the editorial software uses "awaiting reviewer selection" to mean that the manuscript has been received but has not been sent to a reviewer. How to handle situation in which the article has been "Awaiting reviewer assignment" for 5 months? Hot Network Questions I recently submitted my first paper to a philosophy journal. Otherwise, please I submitted my paper in January. Peer review is the process used to assess whether an academic paper is suitable for publication based on the quality, originality and importance of the work. The status "Awaiting Referee Report" implies that the reviewers are already assigned and review work is in-progress. There is no need for anonymising the manuscript upon In Covidence, the status "awaiting other reviewer" means that a reference has been voted on by one reviewer, but a second vote is required before the reference can be moved to the next stage in the review process. If that was the case for your paper, then a subsequent change to "Awaiting reviewer invitation" would mean that the editor is sending your paper for an additional review. Editor assigned I have two questions. So, even after one reviewer submits his report, the immediate change in status would be a reflection of that action, i. She informed me that one reviewer had returned their review and the other review was pending with a The acronym ME most likely stands for "Managing Editor" or "Manuscript Editor", and so the message says that the paper is awaiting processing by this person. And after 4 months the status changed to "awaiting EIC decision". (I thought you had already tried email, sorry. 9. I find "awaiting reviewer invitation" to be a slightly strange phrase, but taken at face value it seems to mean that they still have not even asked anyone to referee the paper, let alone found a referee, let alone gotten the report back from a referee! The status "Awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editor has sent out reviewer invitations. Probably means it will be desk rejected if it did not go out to reviewers. 2. If the editor is satisfied with your work, they will choose appropriate peer reviewers to evaluate your work, taking into account several factors including expertise, experience So, we have made some edits/assumptions. 5. This means that when a user role is updated, the e-mail templates will automatically be updated. Depending on the journal's workflow, this status could also indicate when the editorial office determines if your submission is eligible for peer review. So I just wonder why it was returned to the AE again – notfunnyatall. ’ But this could be because the associate editor (AE) may have had a challenge finding reviewers for your manuscript. ' However, I'm Normally whenever this status shows it usually means that decision arrives in 3-5 days. How to handle situation in which the article has been "Awaiting reviewer assignment" for 5 months? 3. Sometimes, a reviewer may pull out after being assigned, for reasons of a lack of time, mismatch (with their subject area), or conflict of interest. I submitted a paper on April 8. I don't know what this means and why it is taking so This means that your manuscript has not yet been assigned to a reviewer. The Action Editor may decide to make a decision without allocating reviewers. View comments as feedback I submitted a short paper to a math journal more that one month ago. May I ask if this is normal? How long have I to wait before formally asking the editor about the status of my submission? My field is mathematics. I was asked to resubmit the paper with modifications within a month. Awaiting Reviewer Selection, which is the next stage, means that the editor has received responses from multiple peer reviewers and is presently in the process of making a selection among them. After about a month, the status switched from "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" to "Awaiting recommendation". 3. Dec 12, 2019 · I submitted my manuscript to a journal. However, there has been no status change for more than two-and-a-half months. · Awaiting EIC Decision and Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Article is undergoing the peer review, and is waiting for the acceptance of its evaluator(s) · Awaiting EIC Decision and Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Article is undergoing the peer review, and one or both of the evaluators has accepted the invitation and/or at least one evaluation has I submitted my paper on June 24 and after few comments from the admin on the paper files I resubmitted the paper. Once the requisite number of reviewers (generally 2 to 3) accept the invitation, the status changes to "Awaiting reviewer scores" which Reviewer List. This will include reviewers who were selected, invited, assigned, invitation response records, and copies of the reviewer score sheets received. Manuscript status changing from Awaiting Reviewer Invitation to Awaiting Reviewer Assignment ? Question. The editor in chief may not just 'accept' or 'reject' the manuscript. Is this normal?I received an acceptance pending minor revisions. Awaiting Reviewer Scores means that your paper is being peer reviewed. 15 answers. The status kept on changing between ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ and ‘Awaiting Reviewer Scores’ for three months, at which point I contacted the editor and requested a projected timeline for the evaluation process. 15 answers My manuscript submission status in manuscriptcentral changed from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘under Hello, I submitted my paper to one of the high impact factor journals month ago. As you've mentioned, you have addressed the previous reviewer's concerns, so the EIC may suggest moving the manuscript to peer-review based on what you have addressed. The following query and answer may be of further help to you: What does awaiting ED decision after awaiting BM assessment mean ? | Editage Insights Peer review process. the status "Awaiting Referee Report" implies that the reviewers are already assigned and review work is in-progress. " The statuses I've seen are: Awaiting Reviewer Selection, Awaiting Third Opinion, Awaiting Screener Assignment, and Awaiting Second Opinion. Under Review: This means Four days later, however, a new line appeared, “Waiting for Reviewer Assignment. "Awaiting reviewers reply" means that your manuscript has been sent out for review. That does not necessarily mean your paper is actually waiting on reviewers to be chosen. At least two of the common review systems show "awaiting reviewer selection" if there is ANY reviewer invitation outstanding. My manuscript submission status in manuscriptcentral changed from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to I have experienced a confusing situation. I submitted an article to a ScholarOne journal. More than two years in a journal. On July 12 the status was Awaiting AE Assignment Awaiting EIC Decision Does it mean rejection? Awaiting Editor Assignment: While this typically means that the manuscript is awaiting assignment to an AE, in this case, it probably means it is awaiting assignment to a peer reviewer. So, the manuscript is out to all two or three reviewers, who will get back with their decision. Awaiting Se Assignment Meaning. -Awaiting AE Assignment Dear Bilal Ahmad The status 'Awaiting AE Recommendation' means the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of • Assign Reviewers: Manuscripts awaiting responses from invited reviewers. Also, one reviewer may send their comments on time or earlier, and the other(s) may take a while to get back. Do not email to ask about What does "awaiting reviewer scores" means after revision? Question. What is the precise meaning of 'best tariff' in the German Telekommunikationsgesetz (TKG)? In Awaiting reviewers simply means that they do not have 3 people who have agreed to review the MS. "awaiting other reviewer" not only signifies a stage in the review process where one reviewer has completed their assessment or screening of a What does "awaiting reviewer scores" means after revision? Question. I revised the paper accordingly and addressed the feedbacks. – PsySp. This means the initial check on the manuscript is complete, which means that the Editor-in-Chief (EiC) and/or the Associate Editor (AE) believe/s the manuscript fulfills basic journal criteria such as novelty of the research, quality of the writing, After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Reviews can be returned to the editor within a few days, or it may take a couple of weeks depending on the journal. Today it went back to "awaiting "Awaiting EIC decision" means that the journal is waiting on a decision by the "Editor in Chief". The AE may have thought that all had come in, but may have later seen that that’s not the case, and so, may have modified the status. As you may know, peer review can take a while, as peer reviewers do this along with their other work. This April, we received the reviewer's response and resubmitted after correction on May 18. It means that the AE has performed their initial check (as described in the previous point) and is looking for suitable peer reviewers. Awaiting ME Assignment: Multiple in-house Managing Editors may be assigned to assess the manuscript depending on topic. A polite email inquiry can't do any harm. In this stage, the editor identifies a few reviewers for your paper and sends out email invitations to them. They could have two, and a bunch of unanswered invites. Last month, I sent an e-mail to the administrator, and I received response which said "Senior editor will respond to your query". After a week of submission, the status changed to "awaiting reviewer selections". the other one move from AE assignment to reviewer selection pretty fast, like in 5 days. This is a placeholder queue that does not require check these manuscripts periodically • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where reviewers have agreed to review, but have not submitted their review Overdue Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where In such cases, the journal will assign a different reviewer. Manuscripts quite often return to this stage if not enough of the invited reviewers accepted the invitation so further invitations need to be sent. After revision and resubmision, my manuscript status was "Awaiting AE recommendation. 5 months ago. You may want to request an update to expedite the rejection. Reviewers are normally asked to submit their comments within 60 (calendar) days in which to carry out a first review. It said awaiting reviewer selection for 3 weeks. This change has occurred The status "Reviewer assignment pending" clearly indicates that your paper has not yet been sent for peer review. – Vicky. I'm not sure what JM checklist refers to, but my guess is that it refers to a journal requirement that you might not have met. The first read is used to form an initial impression of the work. Is it possible to get a desk reject after the "awaiting reviewer selection" stage? Awaiting Admin Processing: Awaiting initial review by the Sage Path Office to ensure we have the correct information to process your manuscript. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Potential "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" means that the paper has been assigned the minimum amount of reviewers that the Associate Editor has set for the manuscript. (‘Referee’ is another term for ‘peer reviewer. After one day the status was EA assignment pending and after two more days it was under review. This change has occurred So, this would mean that from "Admin: Not Assigned," the status changed to "EA: [name],"first, and then to "Awaiting ED assignment" and finally to "Awaiting CE decision. This means that while the manuscript cleared the desk screening and was deemed good to go for peer review, the journal is finding it somewhat challenging to identify the right peer reviewers for your paper. Does this mean the article is rejected? Asked by S Gh on 02 Dec, 2021 Generally, the status changes to "Awaiting ED recommendations" once peer review for the paper is done and the reviewer comments have come in. The status is still "awaiting assignment" and I checked the online system which shows that even no editor has been assigned to my paper. 00 means that no reviews have been rated. According to the process described in IEEE Transactions, "Awaiting AE recommendation" status means that the AE has collected all reviews from the reviewers who were assigned to review your manuscript and that the AE's decision for acceptance is pending. After 20 days, status has changed from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer assignment" and after 4 days, it has changed to "awaiting reviewer scores". Now the handling One of them got accepted within 10 days, but the status for the other one has been "Awaiting AE assignment" for 15 days now. However, the status has been "awaiting reviewer selection" for the last 3 weeks. Thus, seemingly, the review process ended only for a second one to be initiated by the EA just days later. You will find out when you find out. About two months after my article was submitted, its status changed from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting PE decision". ' If the two reviews come in, and are concordant, the editor can decide to make the decision with the two reviews in hand. However, yesterday the status reverted back to "Awaiting Reviewer Selection". So I thought it passed the associate editor's evaluation and now they were looking for reviewers. But if it is, it probably means the following. After the ADM had been assigned, I remember seeing "reviewer assignment" and "reviewer After 18 days the status was "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment". In short, the switching of the status repeatedly from “awaiting reviewer selection” to “awaiting reviewer assignment” and back implies that the editor is having a hard time finding reviewers for your paper. How do you submit a rating? When you open a review in the AE queue there will see a question at the end marked "Quality Assessment. The invitations have been sent (probably in multiple rounds), but the reviewers have not yet agreed to review the Here's what each status likely means: Awaiting Reviewer Selection: The editor is trying to find suitable reviewers for your revised manuscript. The status “'Awaiting AE evaluation'” means that that the peer review has been completed and now the Assigned Editor (AE) will consider the feedback provided by the peer reviewers and arrives at a decision. It looks like the editor wanted another opinion about the paper Stage 2: Editor assigned Once your manuscript passes the initial quality check, we assign it to a member of Editorial Board, who is an active researcher in your field. Awaiting Reviewer Selection After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Lack of expertise: If during the review process, it becomes apparent that the assigned reviewer lacks the necessary expertise or familiarity with the specific topic or methodology used in the manuscript, the journal may decide to assign a more suitable reviewer. (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Dear Team, First, thank you for running such a stunning forum. (3) At most, each reviewer should be assigned to a defined number of manuscripts, b j, chosen by the team responsible for assigning reviewers. This change has occurred Generally speaking, the status "Awaiting a reviewer reply" could mean either of two things: 1. From your query, it seems reviewers have been assigned for your manuscript. Review Settings . A few days ago, it was changed to "awaiting reviewer selection". Decide not enough of having an additional review the assigned editor would you? Manuscript is accepted the manuscript may a decision can a potential conflict of a new reviewer assignment stage. Generally, 2-3 peer reviewers are assigned to a paper. Even yesterday the status was still "awaiting reviewer selection", but today it was changed to "awaiting EIC decision". One possibility is that since there was a delay in the review, the paper was sent to a different reviewer without waiting too long for the overdue review. After one week with the editor, the Becoming a Peer Reviewer; Career Advice for researchers; Mental Health. The status of the paper changed several times. I could not guess what this possibly means. What does this mean? Was the manuscript reviewed? I think the status should have changed to something like Awaiting Reviewer Scores before Awaiting EIC Decision. The minimum would be either two or three depending on the Initially your manuscript will go through stages such as “Awaiting Admin Checklist” and/or “Awaiting Editor Assignment” depending on how new submissions are initially checked The status "Awaiting reviewer assignment" means that your paper has cleared teh initial editorial screening and will be sent for peer review. The ‘Accept’ perhaps means that it is awaiting the peer reviewers’ acceptance – that is, their readiness to review the manuscript. A few days ago, the status changed from 'Awaiting reviewer response' to 'Awaiting reviewer scores. The second update, Awaiting Referee Selection, means that the manuscript has completed the internal check and is now awaiting peer review. " Initially, once your paper was submitted, the Does it happen that the editor asks the reviewers to re-review a paper? For about 10 days or so it has been "awaiting final decision" after a few months of under review and then awaiting reviewers scores. Commented Mar 26, AE means it is awaiting associate editor Scenario 2: awaiting reviewer selection>> under review If this was the way the status had changed, then it is possible that the online status tracking software uses the status "awaiting reviewer selection" to indicate that the paper is with the editor. Editorial decisions I submitted my manuscript to Management Science. After revising and resubmit an article (the first peer review result was "minor revisions"), the status changed after 3 weeks to "Awaiting Decision". If major problems are found at this stage, the reviewer may feel comfortable rejecting the paper without further work. ’ However, 14 days later, it changed to ‘Reviewers Invited. Now, the status is 'Awaiting EiC Decision. I have submitted my paper to an IET journal. If the The reviewer sets time aside to read the paper several times. It’s only when the status changes to ‘Under Review,’ as you have rightly understood, that the actual review begins. Commented Mar 14, 2022 at 2:51. However, I definitely remember the last two: Feb 26, 2021 · Awaiting Reviewer Assignment means the journal editor has started reaching out to potential reviewers for your manuscript. Commented Nov 21, 2016 at 12:27. The journal says on average they take 30 days to make a decision on a paper. My last status was ''awaiting AE recommendation," and now it has changed to ''awaiting ED decision'' does this means my paper is rejected or what? Right after the submission, the status changed to "Awaiting AE assignment" but it remains for about three months. At first, the status showed "awaiting AE recommendation". After that, it changed to Awaiting Referee Selection once again. ’) So, great, that’s one step After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Some reviewers will ask for a longer period of time; if the request is reasonable, please grant it. Just give it some time; either you will get a decision or it will go for the review process. After making the necessary changes, I submitted the manuscript. ’ Does anyone know what Awaiting AE Assignment after one month of Awaiting Reviewer Scores means in ScholarOne? I find this very weird. ” This means that one of the two original reviewers declined to review this revised version of the manuscript, and so the editor had a choice: continue without this reviewer or find a replacement. " Then it changed to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" What does it mean? Will my paper be reviewed again? The status “awaiting final decision after awaiting reviewer scores” means that the peer review has been completed and the reviewer comments have been sent back to the editorial office for assessment. What does this mean? Please help. Awaiting Editor Assignment: Your article has passed initial quality checks by the Editorial Production Assistant and is in the process of being assigned to an appropriate Editor who will evaluate your article for scope, quality, and fit for the journal. These status should not be taken seriously. A week later, the status changed to Awaiting Editor Assignment. Asked 4th Aug, 2021; Today, I noticed that the status was then changed to "awaiting reviewer assignment". What can this mean? The platform is This means that the manuscript has been sent for peer review and the peer review has likely been completed, and now the journal is awaiting the final scores from the reviewer/s. e. Awaiting Reviewer Selection While the Editor is assigned to a manuscript, authors may see the status “Awaiting EIC Assignment”. The ME, or perhaps the Editor-in-Chief (EiC), will make the final decision based on I submited my paper to The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. But in the journal i submitted to, under review means AE is examining the paper as the first stage, while "awaiting reviewer scores" means it's actually out for review. This change has occurred After almost three weeks of "Awaiting reviewer assignment" status, it changes to "Reviewers contacted". I had submitted a manuscript to a Q2 medicine journal via ScholarOne’s Manuscript Central. After a couple of days, the status changed from "Awaiting AE assignment" to "Under Review". This change has occurred Since then it has been 4 months and the paper is still 'awaiting reviewer invitation'. Anyway, they seem to Answer: Dear author, The editorial hierarchy varies from journal to journal. to ‘Awaiting AE Recommendation’ typically means that the Associate Editor (AE) has had a look at the paper and decided not to send it for review. We have developed some helpful tips to guide you through the revision process. Last December, I submitted my paper to a Springer Nature journal. It shows all status changes throughout the life of the manuscript, from the initiation of the submission process through quality control, reviewer assignment, and decision. 2f New reviewer(s) required If insufficient reviewer comments are received or if the comments are inconclusive additional peer reviewers will be identified. After agreeing to review a manuscript, external reviewers are typically granted 28 days to complete the assignment. ’ So far, so good. This may, however, vary across journals. If they do, they would be assigned at this stage. Eic usually signifies the Editor in chief. This status indicates that a Managing Editor is being assigned based on that Meaning of ‘Awaiting Editor Assignment’ This means that your manuscript has cleared the admin check, that is, it was found matching the journal’s scope and also adhering to the journal’s guidelines, apart from a cursory check of the novelty and quality of the study. After submitting the revised article for a week, a ADM was assigned and the status has changed to "awaiting reviewer invitation. Related reading: What does a status change from "Awaiting reviewer score" back to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" mean? Thank you for your question. 2fx Awaiting COI Awaiting all author Conflict of Interest forms to be supplied 2g Report sent to Editor-in-Chief Peer reviewer comments are sent to the Editor-in-Chief of the journal. During this time, the editor looks for suitable reviewers for your paper and sends out After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. However, after a few days, I got a desk reject notification. Eventually, an editor will make a decision and you will get your paper back with comments from peer reviewers. Here's what each status likely means: Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Potential reviewers have been identified, and the editor is in the process of assigning them to review your manuscript. That way, less reviewer time is wasted, and it would have a general downward effect on the number I submitted a manuscript and the status changed from Awaiting AE assignment to Awaiting Referee Selection and then Awaiting Referee Assignment. As stated by Rodriguez, Bollen, and Van de Sompel (2007): “one of the first and potentially most important stage is the one that attempts to distribute submitted 0. hhjrpp lbuyuf uxdlb kfu igt nwft qqncqrj vvtrl shy lnhks